Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto Z4's score of 79.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is newer, but a bit thicker and much heavier than Moto Z4.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better resolution back camera and a lot higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has better battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Moto Z4, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.