Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a overall score of 98.9 against 79.9. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, providing a couple nice extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and OPPO Find X3 Pro were only released 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a little bit heavier but also a little bit thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher resolution camera, a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a battery lifetime that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.