Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy A32's global score of 84.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is somewhat thinner but a bit heavier than Galaxy A32, and both were released only a couple of months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra works with Android 13 OS, and Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a way greater pixel amount per inch in the display, a way higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.