Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A60's global score of 82.3. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11, so it offers lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A60.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot higher video quality and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.