Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a little bit better than the Galaxy A90 5G, having a overall score of 98.9 against 90.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A90 5G's, but it's just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra works with Android 13 OS, while Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a better screen pixel density and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures. The Galaxy A90 5G's battery life is just as good as Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.