Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a general score of 98.9 against 81. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a larger display and a greater screen density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.