Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is better than Galaxy M30s's overall score of 83.3. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy M30s's, but it is a little bit heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations, a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy M30s features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.