Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than Xperia XZ2's score of 79.1. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is noticeably newer and way thinner, but also a bit heavier than Xperia XZ2. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a much lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, a just a little lower pixels density and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xperia XZ2, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a much better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ2, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.