Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is heavier and just a little bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, offering a lot of extra features.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. They have 8 processing cores and 12 GB of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more memory to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.