Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a 98.9 score against 78.2. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is just a little heavier but somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and they were released only 5 months apart.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a just a little better pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a much higher video quality and a way larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.