Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is a lot newer, but a lot heavier and a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number per inch of display. Google Pixel 2 features as much memory for games and applications as Samsung Galaxy Note 20, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 59 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.