Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Google Pixel XL, with a score of 90.8 against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a much newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel XL, but it is somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater count of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Note 20 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a less MP camera, it also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video and a lot higher video resolution.
Google Pixel XL counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as Samsung Galaxy Note 20, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features greater battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 costs more money than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.