Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than LG V20, with a 90.8 score against 77. The Galaxy Note 20 design is way newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than LG V20. The LG V20 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processor than LG V20, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures slightly better pictures and videos than LG V20, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos and a lot better video quality.
LG V20 has much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.