Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a a little heavier cellphone than LG V50 ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much higher video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.