Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 79.9. Galaxy Note 20's construction has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 both feature quite similar processing units, and although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X3 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.