Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 81. Galaxy Note 20's body is way newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's a bit heavier and thicker. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy C9 Pro features slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 has a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a lot higher video quality. The Galaxy Note 20 features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.