Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's incredibly thicker and was released many years before. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger display and a just a bit greater pixel density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has faster 30 fps video frame rates, a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.