Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an a little heavier and a little bit thicker device than the vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2376, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per inch of screen.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 2% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.