Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 365.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 3's 79.5 general score. Although the LG Velvet is a bit heavier than the Galaxy Note 3, it's a little bit thinner and also much newer. LG Velvet has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more processing cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, although it has a bit lower pixels density, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a quite smaller screen. LG Velvet has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG Velvet features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a larger aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better resolution back camera. LG Velvet features superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery capacity.
The LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.