Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 365.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, with a 79.8 score against 79.5. Motorola One Hyper's construction is notably newer than Galaxy Note 3's, although it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller screen and a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has lesser CPU cores and less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Motorola One Hyper shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images.
The Motorola One Hyper has a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has improved battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola One Hyper is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.