Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 365.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's 79.5 general score. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but it is just a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 have very similar CPUs, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51, although it has a just a little worse screen pixel density, a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, a way larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A51 counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.