Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the LG K52, having a global score of 81.2 against 76. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while LG K52 has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 3 is a just a little lighter phone than LG K52, but both of them have the same thickness.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080px resolution and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Note 3 and the LG K52 both count with incredibly similar processing units, because although the LG K52 has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG K52 features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K52 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG K52 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
LG K52 has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.