Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the LG V20, having an 81.2 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a way older and just a little thicker phone than the LG V20, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid screen than LG V20, although it has a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way lower amount of pixels in each display inch, they both have a display with the same size.
The LG V20 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit faster processor than LG V20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The LG V20 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V20 also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
LG V20 and Galaxy Note 3 both feature incredibly similar battery durations.
Although Galaxy Note 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.