Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 3, with an 83.7 score against 81.2. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little heavier device than Galaxy Note 3, but both are 0.33inches thick. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a much worse display density, a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a quite smaller screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a lower video definition and a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a way larger camera aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.