Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50, with a score of 81.2 against 81.2. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note 3 is extremely older and a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50, it's construction is still a little lighter. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.