Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, even though it was released 7 years before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little bit smaller display and a little lower pixel density. The Moto G Stylus has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 has a bit faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a way larger aperture, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.