Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's overall score of 79.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version. Galaxy Note 3 is a way older, thicker and just a little heavier device than the Moto Z4.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a more vivid screen than Moto Z4, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z4 has a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Moto Z4 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Moto Z4 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto Z4 also has a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a way bigger sensor and a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.