Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Galaxy Note 3's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is lighter. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a lot lower screen density, a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller screen. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, higher video frame rate and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.