Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is somewhat thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 has a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images in poorly lited environments and a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.