Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an extremely older and a lot thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it notably lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot larger display, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a little higher screen pixel density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot higher resolution camera, a lot bigger camera sensor, a lot larger aperture and a much higher video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.