Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 78.8. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and a little thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's design is still a bit lighter. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per display inch, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller display. Vivo X60 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro features better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 31% larger battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.