Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's 81.1 score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is way newer, but a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Galaxy Note 3 features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a bit worse screen density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit more expensive than the Galaxy Note 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.