Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic indigo |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 score. These phones have Android operating system, but Moto G Stylus has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it gives a couple additional features and improved performance. The Moto G Stylus is a incredibly newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it is heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Moto G Stylus has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a higher number of cores. The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Moto G Stylus counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Moto G Stylus is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.