Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a 79.9 score against 79.3. These phones work with Android operating system, but OPPO Find X3 Pro has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The OPPO Find X3 Pro body is newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a quite lower pixel density, a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a way more megapixels back facing camera, a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.