Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass; metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 works with Android 5.1 operating system. Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen pixel density and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Galaxy A32 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A32 also has more cores (but slower). Galaxy A32 takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.