Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Galaxy A71 5G's body is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, providing you some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a greater performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments.
Galaxy A71 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A71 5G is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.