Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 score. Samsung Galaxy A80 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Galaxy Note 5, but it is heavier and thicker. Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A80 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy A80 takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.