Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass; metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting a 90.5 score against 79.3. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 comes with Android 5.1 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a extremely newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better display pixels density. Galaxy A90 5G features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more processing cores. The Galaxy A90 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.