Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-08-13 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| Glass; metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5, getting a score of 81 against 79.3. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer and just a little thinner device than Galaxy Note 5, but it is also a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, counting with a couple additional features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy C9 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 7 more processing cores. The Galaxy C9 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and a F1.9 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 also has a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.