Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a 79.3 score against 78.8. The Galaxy Note 5 construction has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, better video frame rates and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.