Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a global score of 86.6 against 80.4. IPhone SE (2022)'s design is much newer, just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The iPhone SE (2022) has a better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a bigger display, way more pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone SE (2022) takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with faster video frame rates.
IPhone SE (2022) is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.