Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 83.7 score against 80.4. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a bit greater pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.