Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 80.4 against 76.4. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a much newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a quite higher pixels number per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 22 percent more battery size. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos and worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.