Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a global score of 81.2 against 80.4. Motorola Edge 50 is a just a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but they are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.