Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an notably older phone than the Moto G Stylus, but Samsung managed to build it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Moto G Stylus features a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Moto G Stylus has a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a camera with much more MP and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The Moto G Stylus has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto G Stylus, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.