Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z4, getting an 80.4 score against 79.8. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto Z4. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel count per display inch.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z4. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Moto Z4 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
Motorola Moto Z4 features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs more money than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.