Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 84.7 score against 80.4. The Galaxy A32 construction is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel quantity per inch of screen and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A32 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.