Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a general score of 82.3 against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy A60 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A60, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A60 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A60 has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 6% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.