Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A71 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy A71 5G has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.