Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a 90.5 score against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G design is much newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number per display inch.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.